Showing posts with label PROJECT 1. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PROJECT 1. Show all posts

Thursday, 1 September 2011

FINAL BOARD PRESENTATION



 board 1

this board shows the opacity and how disconnected the public is from the politics. extending outwards it shows how the design of canberra is aesthetically pleasing and works, but the commute to and from isn't to appealing. the disconnection from the rest of the country is significant in how we as a population view our commanding government, transparent & accountability - disconnected public. 


 board 2




 board 3

WRITTEN PROJECT STATEMENT

the project has run very smoothly and it has developed into a gem - for the structure of the strategy it really captures what the australian lifestyle is all about. development is key for a country will vast ranges of infrastructure, telecommunication, education and identity. it can encourage us to be more interactive through passive architectural design for our everyday lives.

"VOTE THEN………..WAIT……….? 
What if your opinion counted more than once every 4 years? 

The location of parliament in Canberra, separated from the large majority of Australia’s population has created a Government power, disconnected from the public it is nominated to serve.

The current Parliamentary infrastructure is a maze of chambers and offices where politicians delegate decision making into committees, whose role it is to engage with the public to gain opinions and report back to the politicians. How can this engagement occur in the 21st century in which the dominant urban infrastructure is information “soft” technology? Can the power to control decisions be distributed back to the community? 

Despite the rise in telecommunication, people ultimately require physical interaction and creating a space where these two functions can intersect is essential. Re-appropriating public space and urban infrastructure is the solution.

By doing so, a means for public interaction, voicing of opinions and voting can be facilitated publicly around all Australian capital cities. This will be achieved by allocating prominent public city spaces nationwide to provide these facilities, thereby creating an active political information network across Australia, which will link back to the existing parliament house in Canberra.

The proposed architectural entity contains 5 key elements – symbolic of parliamentary functions, which are:
1. Communication
2. Education
3. Infrastructure
4. Virtual Element
5. Identity

Interactive screens allow people to communicate and participate in national issue discussions, and the information sharing is collected into a national database. This digital infrastructure will also serve as a public education tool, and the physical presence and location across Australian cities creates an entity that encourages the public to engage with. The locality of the screens direct people through the space in a formal manner just as the formal orientation of Capital Hill is positioned through to Landscaped views.

The history of parliament originated with people gathering in public spaces to discuss issues relevant to the community. The growing global population has increased the amount and complexity of societies’ issues yet not decreased the need for people to be involved in the solutions. The people are just waiting for a platform to voice their opinions.

DON’T WAIT!
HAVE YOUR VOICE HEARD NOW!"
 it was really hard to conceptionalize the ability of the government and how you and me as young individuals barely affected by these policies and legislation or whether generation y are just ignorant. bringing the history back into modern society it can encourage interaction with all classes of statue within the community. will this strategy work - in my opinion it has the ability to change the way we interact with each other and our community.


Sunday, 28 August 2011

dis.trib.u.tion

Dandelion Urban Gnome

Davor posted on black board the outline to what form of architectural distribution we are to examine and make benefit australian parliament building/connection/icon. I say these three possibilities to outline the futuristic approach needed be taken for the benefit of the australian people. 
"This studio will explore and create a proposition, based on DISTRIBUTED approach. How, why, where, when and what, will be the questions we will try to answer. But our foremost goal will be to explore and understand the history of this country, forcing political engagement, democracy, decision making and trying to predict our vision as architects for the future."
what are we to look for but what is already there. the idea behind our design approach is not to make a more functional building hence the common expression, "form follows function", but to design the way the people approach, connect and can interact with their government. architecture has been designed in the past to the buildings approach to the function. where as, the architecture needs to follow peoples interaction and function. designing for the impact of that into architecture could change and future-proof the nations politics. 
“By incorporating a variety of views there is greater opportunity for a successful outcome”.
 Are we ready?

Sunday, 7 August 2011

STRATEGIES


VIRTUAL . FLEXIBLE . MOBILE . DISTRIBUTED 

indeterminacy 

australia benifits from a diverse range of architecture. the limitations are generally due to our climate, tourism and economy.